Was Kobe's Big Night the Worst 60+ Point Game Of All Time?
As the time ticked down in the final minutes of the fourth quarter the tension in the Garden was reaching a fever pitch. Would he do it? Was it possible? Was this history in the making?
And, no. It wasn't Kobe's point total that had me at the edge of my seat late in the game. He had scored so many from the free-throw line (he went 20 for 20) on so many dubious touch calls and so wholly divorced himself from his teammates that watching his scoring display was more like being in an art gallery than at a sporting event. We were looking at something incredibly impressive that I couldn't fathom most people doing but there was little immediacy to it. He was firing up a few lightly-to-slightly contested jumpshots each minute that he was on the court and making more than he was missing. No doubt, it was something that most players couldn't pull off but it was also something that most players wouldn't attempt so doggedly without at least making concessions to their teammates. All in all, 50 points was a long time coming and not a shock when it arrived. 60 was a mild surprise but it was also deliberate. Of the last 12 offensive possessions that Kobe was on the floor for he either shot or got to the line 10 times. Trevor Ariza managed to sneak in two shot attempts during this time but there was no doubt that Kobe was just trying to score as many points as he could. Los Angeles called a timeout with 2:32 to play. They were up 18 points. And Kobe came back out. He had 59 points. He nailed two more free throws and then exited with 61. These were meaningless points. DJ Mbenga should have been on the floor. Not Kobe. When Bernard King scored 60 (for the previous MSG high) on Christmas day in 1984 he did it in a shootout against Michael Ray Richardson and the Nets. The Knicks lost that game by six and each point King scored was desperately needed by his club. He was carrying them on his back.
Unfortunately, too many of the johnny-come-latelies and carpet-bagging Lakers fans had dampened their pants with enthusiasm as Kobe pushed aside his teammates for his own glorification.
I was on pins and needles, however, as the game wound down. I wanted to see if Kobe Bryant could pull off a 60 point and zero rebound game. It seemed impossible. And, I was pretty sure that it had never been done before. Frankly, I became obsessed with it once I noticed. As Kobe feigned interest on defense and fired off laser beams from deep on the other end I was ever anxious that a long carom would hit him in the hands. Thankfully this did not happen. He left the game to rapturous applause and I knew that history had just been made. Impressive history and dubious history.
Impressively, Monday night was Kobe's sixth 60-point outing of his career. He's now second on the 60-point game list behind Wilt Chamberlain. The Stilt has 32 such games on his resume. Which abounds with numerical wonders. Michael Jordan trails both, forever, with 5 such games. Before last night, it was Jordan's famous double-nickle game at the Garden in 1995 (while wearing the four-five) that was the unimpeachable standard for a performance by a visitor. Kobe scored 61 on Monday. But has he really outdone Jordan?
Kobe did score more points on fewer shots. But that was in large part because he got nine more attempts from the free throw line than Jordan did when he scored 55. Also, it can't be forgotten that Jordan scored all the points while bringing the Bulls from behind against a Knicks team that finished the season with 55 wins. Most impressively, he recorded one of his two assists on the game-winning play. He fed Bill Wennington for a dunk that killed the Knicks during the endgame. That assist hurt even more than if Jordan had dunked it over Ewing, Oakley and my grandfather. That pass hurt badly. Given the context, I'd say that MJ's game was more impressive. Like King's 60 points in '84, every score mattered.
There have been, fittingly, 60 games in NBA history during which a single player has compiled 60 or more points. Wilt Chamberlain, who as I mentioned is responsible for 32 of these games, owns the single-game points record with 100 in a game. Also against the Knicks. I'm going to guess that Wilt had at least one rebound in that game. But, it's unfair to compare Kobe's 61 to Wilt's century mark. In fact, it's mostly futile to compare Kobe's big night at the Garden to any of Wilt's 60-point outings. Chamberlain was a different animal. By sheer virtue of his size he was bound to rebound the ball.
This leaves the other 28 games in which a player has scored 60 points. And before we go any further down this primrose path, let me say that saying this is the worst 60-point game of all time is like saying that Ingrid Seynhaeve is the least attractive model in the 1993 Sports Illustrated swimsuit issue. She's still hotter than Hansel right now. It's all relative. So, let's bear that in mind as we take a look at these other games. The game Bryant had is probably one of the top 100 or 150 games ever by an NBA player. But, is it worse than the other 59 60-point games?
Yes. In my opinion, it's the worst.
Going back to the 1986-87 season there have been 15 occassions on which a player has topped 60. No player (Kobe included) ever recorded zero rebounds. Including Monday night, just three had fewer than 6 boards. Kobe had 5 boards while scoring 60 against Memphis in 2007 and Iverson had 4 against Orlando in 2004. In that game Iverson had 6 assists, 5 steals and block. He scored 60 on the nose and his team won. He took at least a dozen shots in the paint and attacked the rim as he always has.
I know it can be simplistic to look at statistics as the be all and end all when documenting the night a player had. But it's also the best place to start. I saw Kobe's game. He didn't defend. He rarely passed. And throughout the second half he rarely played aggressively. He took what the defense gave him (15+ foot jumpers) and he benefited from a lot of favorable officiating.
The number of rebounds and steals put up by other members of the 60-point club displays the way they imposed themselves upon their opponents. In arguably the best game of the group, Jordan scored 69, grabbed 18 boards, dished out 6 assists, nabbed 6 steals and blocked a shot @ Cleveland in 1990. He also committed five personal fouls. Now, that is game in which he bent the opposition to his will. In 2006, Gilbert Arenas scored 60 against Kobe's Lakers and grabbed 8 boards and handed out 8 dimes. Another complete game. David Robinson, Shaq and Karl Malone have all topped 60 and they had 14, 23 and 18 boards respectively. I haven't be able to track down the box score for George Mikan's 61-pointer in 1952 but I'm going to guess the game's first giant picked up a double double.
I have no doubt that further rifling through yellowed newsprint or long-underused microfiche at the public library would further highlight the lack of depth in Kobe's record-setting game at the Garden. But, no amount of data is really needed to convince me (although I'm not sure about anyone reading this...). Because I watched Kobe with my own eyes. He was not like Jordan out there. He had an icy resolve but no ferocity. If anyone on the Lakers was really holding the Knicks down it was Pau Gasol, who had 31 points, 5 assists, 14 rebounds (4 on the offensive end) and 2 blocks.
I don't care what anyone says about the inanity of focusing on such a small detail because I have watched enough basketball to know that someone giving it there all does not come through 37 minutes of action without gathering a single rebound. It just doesn't happen. If you drive to the paint then you eventually gather your own miss or get a tip in after dishing the ball to a big. If you are playing tight defense then you inevitably follow a man underneath the hoop. And, without Andrew Bynum in the lineup there were more rebounds to be had.
I don't doubt that Kobe is capable of getting boards. And, that's the worst part. I just think that last night he didn't care. He left the hustle and the contact to his subordinates and only worried about getting his. It really wasn't inspiring. Which makes all the slobbering over him in the media that much harder to take. Where is the love for Pau's game? Where is the mention of the fact that the dude got 1/3 of his points at the stripe and is playing in a league with hand-check fouls that would made Jordan invincible?
I guess it's not news to say that Kobe isn't as good as MJ. But, after listening to everyone fawn over Kobe for the past few days it still feels like something worth noting.
And, you know what the worst part about this is? It's made me agree with Reggie Miller and stick up for Michael Jordan.
Wednesday, February 4, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
10 comments:
well done, and I agree with you on everything. Jordan's 55 was a killer for me, too. Bill Wennington! No!
ESPN is wasting time comparing Kobe's 61/0/3 with Lebrons 52/11/10. Seriously?
The first half of the Jordan 55 point game, and the first half of game 1 of the '92 Finals are the most "on fire" halves I remember seeing from Jordan. I think he dropped 35 in both.
Jordan's 69/18 against the Cavs in '90 went to OT (so the points were critical). I'm pretty sure he had 60 in regulation though.
a breath of fresh air. i've read so much praise for kobe's 61-point game against the knicks that i don't think anyone would notice that kobe had zero rebounds.
the way i see it, kobe being a big guard could rack up a triple-double almost every night if he wanted to. but on that game against the knicks, when kobe saw that his j is on, he just rode it and never gave any thought to defending or dominating the knicks in all facets of the game. if based on that game, no one would call kobe one of the best perimeter defender in the league.
but hey, he scored 61 points and that's not even close to being called not bad. as you put it, it's all relative.
I was equally shocked that the zero rebound thing got so little play the next day too. At least mention it when talking about the game! Mike Wilbon called Kobe's performance sublime on PTI. Jamal And, I'm going to bet he didn't actually watch the game live. He saw a highlight package just like most everyone else.
It's fitting that Lebron had a 50+point triple double the next night because that should help put Kobe's game in slightly better perspective. Hopefully.
What a pathetic hate piece. Your hero worship of MJ puts you no better than a groupie.
Kobe's shooting performance was a better shooting percentage than both MJ's and Lebrons in far fewer minutes and shot attempts.
You go on hating and living in the past, while the rest of us enjoy greatness.
That 61 sounded it really hurt your feelings...lol
OMG! There's nothing like a heckle that ends in LOL. Nice touch.
Two things. First, I'd take a 52-point triple double over Kobe's 61/0 game any day. And, secondly, by holding Kobe's game over Lebron's aren't you, in an abbreviated timeline, also living in the past?
Actually anonymous if you're talking about Jordan's 69 point game (which we were), he was 23-37, or 62%. Kobe was 19-31, or 61%.
They are of course pretty much dead on. Why latch on that point?
The whole post & comments was an honest analysis of Kobe's 61 point game. An awesome game, but as some have noted, not an awesome game compared to other 60 point games. No one is "hating" or whatever you want to say. Don't be so sensitive.
I'm going to take this back to Rip City, where it will be framed.
when someone scores 60 points and your first reaction is "yeah but how many rebounds did he have?" then obvoiusly your opinion is biased and tainted. boy jordan really beat you guys down for you to fawn over him like you say everyone fawns over kobe. your broken. and why do you hate kobe and the lakers so much? its the only time the knicks have managed to beat a team in the finals. probably cause that was more than 35 years ago and it will never, ever happen again. and whoever put those stats about jordan 62%, you made my fellow anonymous posters point. Less shots. hate on haters! this is a blatant kobe hate blog. no objectivity. And thats what i dont get. you should spend your hating on someone who deserves it. that peice of crap and team killing cancer, stephon marbury.
Mr Anonymous is absolutely hilarious. Not only did he break the out the middle-school textspeak but he is also the only one spewing the sort of vitriol that he is so vigorously attacking but he also seems to be the only who didn't read the piece or anything else on the website. Because, time and again, I went out of my way to qualify what I was writing to say that Kobe's game was great. All I was saying was that it wasn't as good as it was being hyped up to be the 24-media cycle which has approximately zero memory.
Because I did write that "saying this is the worst 60-point game of all time is like saying that Ingrid Seynhaeve is the least attractive model in the 1993 Sports Illustrated swimsuit issue. She's still hotter than Hansel right now. It's all relative. So, let's bear that in mind as we take a look at these other games. The game Bryant had is probably one of the top 100 or 150 games ever by an NBA player."
If I'm a hater for saying that the dude just had one of the best 150 games in the history of professional basketball than I guess the definition of hate was changed to "lacking blind devotion."
Jeez. I said some guy's game isn't that historic and this dude says the Knicks are never, ever going to win a title. Now, that is worth of an LOL.
Post a Comment